Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect with me on Flickr

Category: Syndicated

iLuv iSP170

[ 0 ] 2012/01/29

The iLuv iSP170 is a pair of 7cm black shiny cubes housing a tiny 1.8watt amp and a pair of similarly ant-pleasing speakers.

One speaker has a large, easily findable volume dial on the back and the second speaker plugs into this one with a simple mono RCA. While there is USB it's power only, so input comes from a 3.5mm jack.

Irritatingly both 3.5mm jack and USB inputs are via hard-wired attached leads that at 90cm will doubtless always prove not quite long enough. Meanwhile the persistently attached wires mean that any stylish sleekness evoked by their low-profile presence is rendered moot through the omnipresent string of spaghetti hanging out the back.

More worrying is the distortion at low driver levels, though give it a maxed out iPhone input and the tiny USB-powered amp stops choking. With plenty of input welly you get a boistrous sound that is 'too loud' long before it actually distorts.

Need your laptop to go louder? Go for it. Need a decent pair of speakers? For £15? Come on.

Read more about iLuv iSP170 at MusicRadar.com


Ultimate Support MS-100 Speaker Stands

[ 0 ] 2012/01/29

These distinctive and stylish stands are a game of two halves combining the MS-100B speaker stand and 'available separately' MS-80 desktop monitor stand together.

The MS-100 hits the ground with three classic speaker spikes that can be shielded with rubber feet (supplied) and its sturdy metal construction is as solid a way to stop vibration as we've encountered. Brilliantly, the central column has three hollow cores for piping cables through without cluttering the view from your control chair.

The MS-80 (also available for £146) is a tough plastic baseplate with a thick stiff foam upper that sits on top. Again, there are hard spikes on the base and our 8" desktops were instantly shielded from fake bass during playback.

Its hidden USP is the hand-cranked dial that can tilt the speakers to point up at you from a desktop or tilt down to your listening position. A great duo and thoroughly recommended.

Read more about Ultimate Support MS-100 Speaker Stands at MusicRadar.com


M-Audio BX5 D2

[ 0 ] 2012/01/29

Monitors may not be the product type you most readily associate with M-Audio, so it might surprise you to discover that, according to sales reports from January 2009 to December 2010, the company's BX5 speaker was the best-selling monitor in the US. Combining high performance with compact design and affordable cost, it understandably represented a popular choice.

M-Audio has now redesigned the monitor, in both appearance and internal construction, and the result is the BX5 D2, a bi-amplified active monitor boasting impressive specs. But do these translate to even higher performance levels? We tested them with an RME Fireface UC…

"The standout frequency ranges are the upper mids, which tingle with clarity yet provide weighty punch."

Inner science

The new design comes in midnight black, with only the silver 'M-Audio' and 'BX5' badges and a tiny blue LED 'on' light between the tweeter and woofer offering any colour. Neatly, to help you position the monitors, the LED shines brightest when you're sitting on-axis from the speaker's front. Round the back, as well as the power inlet and rocker switch, you'll find both balanced XLR and balanced or unbalanced TRS inputs and a volume dial.

The front face offers a new 5" Kevlar cone that provides sound from the new low-frequency driver. Upper frequencies are distributed through a 1" silk dome, with a crossover frequency between the cones at 3kHz, the net result providing 70W of power, with 40W provided by the bass driver and 30 via the tweeter.

Both speaker cones are magnetically shielded and the whole bundle, while rather muted in appearance, is nevertheless attractive.

A punch above

In use, the BX5s are seriously impressive for a monitor this size. The standout frequency ranges are the upper mids, which tingle with clarity yet provide weighty punch, while the top end sizzles nicely without overcooking content in this area.

The majority of affordable compact speakers are found wanting here but the BX5s just get on with doing their job very well, without providing ear fatigue or clatter. Inevitably for a 5" cone, the bass has to come in for some scrutiny - but a lowest frequency of 53Hz is perfectly acceptable for a monitor this size.

While you'd never trust sub-bass frequencies on compact speakers, they still provide a great platform to accurately mix bass and kicks - though use a multimeter to check for bass spikes. The low mid-range is nice too and with the crossover frequency at 3kHz, there's none of the awkwardness caused by too many sounds being unnaturally split across the cones.

There's a punch to the BX5s that makes them an ideal monitor for pop and dance music but they're accurate enough for intricate mixing, so I suspect they'll also find favour with those working in post-production and sound design, while they'd make an excellent choice for those putting home cinema and surround systems together too.

The original BX5s have been market leaders for a fair while now but it's impressive that, rather than waiting to let rival firms make up ground, M-Audio has shaken up the range to keep it right at the front of the pack. As touched on above, if you like the idea of the BX5s but know you'll need greater bass extension, the larger BX8s have been overhauled too, with a frequency range of 38Hz to 22kHz.

Don't underestimate these little brothers though - they're very impressive and offer a bargain for beginner producers or as a second pair.

Read more about M-Audio BX5 D2 at MusicRadar.com


Yamaha Vintage Stomp Pack bundle

[ 0 ] 2012/01/29

Despite its longstanding place at the commercial leading-edge of digital sound technology, Yamaha is viewed primarily as a hardware company.

The reality of course is that inside all its digital synths, mixers and effects is a considerable amount of signal processing software. It shouldn't be forgotten that Yamaha also owns Steinberg, makers of Cubase, Wavelab and range of software instruments.

This brings us to the Yamaha Vintage Plug-in Collection - a series of plug-in bundles consisting of the Vintage Channel Strip, Vintage Open Deck and Vintage Stomp Pack - which comes hot on the heels of the Steinberg RND Portico products endorsed by audio legend Rupert Neve (and with premium prices to match).

All of these are based on Yamaha's Virtual Circuit Modelling (VCM) technology and come in both VST2, VST3 and AU flavours. A USB e-Licenser dongle is required (but not included).

VCM and the 'Vintage' Sound

Yamaha developed 'Virtual Circuit Modelling' (VCM) technology as an offshoot of its research into physical modelling nearly 20 years ago. The principle behind VCM is that the circuit - rather than just the resulting sound - is modelled in order to emulate a given hardware device.

Interestingly, this isn't the first time these Yamaha plug-ins have seen the light of day. In 2005 Yamaha offered users of their DM-range of mixers the ability to update the onboard processing with the AE011 Channel Strip, AE021 Master Strip and AE051 Vintage Stomp Box packages - all looking very similar to those under review.

We weren't able to do a side-by-side comparison of the old and new, but Yamaha have made no play of suggesting that the current plugs are any better than those on their digital mixers. This could lead to confusion, but does explain the pricing – and raises questions about the nature of 'vintage' plugs, the quality of their emulation, and what we should expect in visual, sonic and functional terms.

Step on

The Vintage Stomp Pack is a collection of three different phasers, a flanger, and a wah - all effects with a strong guitar-based following, though equally useful on other sources. All of these owe a debt to MXR and Electro-Harmonix pedals of the past, providing a range of decent modulation flavours.

These effects have a certain warmth and depth, though arguably they do lack the outright grit and nuance of some competing products. A wider range of effects would have made this bundle a more ballsy and coherent 'stomp box' plug collection, with chorus and distortion being particular omissions.

Plug and play?

Ultimately, Yamaha's new plug-ins are all competent, without offering anything radically different from other more interesting competing products.

We might feel differently if they were half the price, but the truth is that both Universal Audio and Waves, to name but two, provide Yamaha with some very strong competition. Surprisingly also, there appear to be no built-in factory presets. If only to get you started, presets are a useful inclusion, and this only reinforces the impression that little effort has gone into the 'added-value' aspect of these plug-ins.

On the plus side, however, no additional hardware is required and the CPU load in general is quite low, enabling you to use many plug-ins concurrently. We'd encourage you try out the downloadable demos on the Steinberg website and decide for yourself if they help resurrect the 'vintage sound'.

Read more about Yamaha Vintage Stomp Pack bundle at MusicRadar.com


Yamaha Vintage Open Deck bundle

[ 0 ] 2012/01/29

Despite its longstanding place at the commercial leading-edge of digital sound technology, Yamaha is viewed primarily as a hardware company.

The reality of course is that inside all its digital synths, mixers and effects is a considerable amount of signal processing software. It shouldn't be forgotten that Yamaha also owns Steinberg, makers of Cubase, Wavelab and range of software instruments.

This brings us to the Yamaha Vintage Plug-in Collection - a series of plug-in bundles consisting of the Vintage Channel Strip, Vintage Open Deck and Vintage Stomp Pack - which comes hot on the heels of the Steinberg RND Portico products endorsed by audio legend Rupert Neve (and with premium prices to match).

All of these are based on Yamaha's Virtual Circuit Modelling (VCM) technology and come in both VST2, VST3 and AU flavours. A USB e-Licenser dongle is required (but not included).

VCM and the 'Vintage' Sound

Yamaha developed 'Virtual Circuit Modelling' (VCM) technology as an offshoot of its research into physical modelling nearly 20 years ago. The principle behind VCM is that the circuit - rather than just the resulting sound - is modelled in order to emulate a given hardware device.

Interestingly, this isn't the first time these Yamaha plug-ins have seen the light of day. In 2005 Yamaha offered users of their DM-range of mixers the ability to update the onboard processing with the AE011 Channel Strip, AE021 Master Strip and AE051 Vintage Stomp Box packages - all looking very similar to those under review.

We weren't able to do a side-by-side comparison of the old and new, but Yamaha have made no play of suggesting that the current plugs are any better than those on their digital mixers. This could lead to confusion, but does explain the pricing – and raises questions about the nature of 'vintage' plugs, the quality of their emulation, and what we should expect in visual, sonic and functional terms.

Reeling in the years

The Vintage Open Deck plug-in is a tape-recording and playback emulator that clearly doffs its hat to old Ampex and Studer analogue machines.

The plug-in divides processing into Recording and Reproduction sections, with one of the four machine models selectable independently for each. Controls are provided for high and low frequency gain, bias and recording/playback level as well as tape speed and type (old or new). We were particularly excited about trying out this tape emulator plug-in.

The best word to describe Open Deck is 'polite'. If you attempt to push the plug-in into obvious tape saturation territory the transition isn't particularly satisfying.

Unlike the Universal Audio Studer A800 plug-in, which enables you to conjure-up a wide range of tones, and with some very nice detail in sonics as the input level is pushed up, Open Deck left us a little cold. There's little doubt that using one on every channel would have a positive effect on your mixes, but we'd have liked more in the way of tonal-shaping possibilities.

Plug and play?

Ultimately, Yamaha's new plug-ins are all competent, without offering anything radically different from other more interesting competing products.

We might feel differently if they were half the price, but the truth is that both Universal Audio and Waves, to name but two, provide Yamaha with some very strong competition. Surprisingly also, there appear to be no built-in factory presets. If only to get you started, presets are a useful inclusion, and this only reinforces the impression that little effort has gone into the 'added-value' aspect of these plug-ins.

On the plus side however, no additional hardware is required and the CPU load in general is quite low, enabling you to use many plug-ins concurrently. We'd encourage you try out the downloadable demos on the Steinberg website and decide for yourself if they help resurrect the 'vintage sound'.

Read more about Yamaha Vintage Open Deck bundle at MusicRadar.com


Yamaha Vintage Channel Strip bundle

[ 0 ] 2012/01/29

Despite its longstanding place at the commercial leading-edge of digital sound technology, Yamaha is viewed primarily as a hardware company.

The reality of course is that inside all its digital synths, mixers and effects is a considerable amount of signal processing software. It shouldn't be forgotten that Yamaha also owns Steinberg, makers of Cubase, Wavelab and range of software instruments.

This brings us to the Yamaha Vintage Plug-in Collection - a series of plug-in bundles consisting of the Vintage Channel Strip, Vintage Open Deck and Vintage Stomp Pack - which comes hot on the heels of the Steinberg RND Portico products endorsed by audio legend Rupert Neve (and with premium prices to match).

All of these are based on Yamaha's Virtual Circuit Modelling (VCM) technology and come in both VST2, VST3 and AU flavours. A USB e-Licenser dongle is required (but not included).

VCM and the 'Vintage' Sound

Yamaha developed 'Virtual Circuit Modelling' (VCM) technology as an offshoot of its research into physical modelling nearly 20 years ago. The principle behind VCM is that the circuit - rather than just the resulting sound - is modelled in order to emulate a given hardware device.

Interestingly, this isn't the first time these Yamaha plug-ins have seen the light of day. In 2005 Yamaha offered users of their DM-range of mixers the ability to update the onboard processing with the AE011 Channel Strip, AE021 Master Strip and AE051 Vintage Stomp Box packages - all looking very similar to those under review.

We weren't able to do a side-by-side comparison of the old and new, but Yamaha have made no play of suggesting that the current plugs are any better than those on their digital mixers. This could lead to confusion, but does explain the pricing – and raises questions about the nature of 'vintage' plugs, the quality of their emulation, and what we should expect in visual, sonic and functional terms.

Channel crossing

The Vintage Channel Strip is made up of an EQ and two compressor plug-ins, with each alluding to - but falling short of naming - the look and feel of the 'classic' units on which they are based.

The EQ 601 has a rather, '70s-era, Neve appearance, while the 276 looks like a UREI 1176. EQ601 is a six-band EQ, with two shelving-filters and four fully parametric bands. There is also a Drive/Clean switch for adding 'more analogue' flavour. We found this EQ easy to use, and sonically competent, but not especially 'special'.

The 276 compressor (just like the original UREI 1176) has a somewhat unusual control system. The Input and Output knobs are used to adjust the amount of compression - the Input knob is a bit like the conventional threshold control in reverse. There's also a switch for managing the make-up gain automatically and a sidechain high-pass filter option, that minimises pumping on bass-heavy material.

Incidentally, the VST3 version of this plug-in makes its sidechain input available to a suitable host DAW. We tested this functionality in Cubase, and everything worked as expected. We liked the 276 plug-in, especially when pushed a little hard in the compression stakes. It certainly has the broad sonic feel of the 1176 on which it is clearly-based, though I we'd stop short of calling it a like-for-like clone - like many of these Yamaha plug-ins it lies to the more 'polite' end of the spectrum.

We did find it both useful and fun to use, though probably not first choice for this type of compression. The 260 has a more conventional layout and adds a different, and quite pleasing, compression flavour to the proceedings

Plug and play?

Ultimately, Yamaha's new plug-ins are all competent, without offering anything radically different from other more interesting competing products.

We might feel differently if they were half the price, but the truth is that both Universal Audio and Waves, to name but two, provide Yamaha with some very strong competition. Surprisingly also, there appear to be no built-in factory presets. If only to get you started, presets are a useful inclusion, and this only reinforces the impression that little effort has gone into the 'added-value' aspect of these plug-ins.

On the plus side however, no additional hardware is required and the CPU load in general is quite low, enabling you to use many plug-ins concurrently. We'd encourage you try out the downloadable demos on the Steinberg website and decide for yourself if they help resurrect the 'vintage sound'.

Read more about Yamaha Vintage Channel Strip bundle at MusicRadar.com


Liine Lemur iOS

[ 0 ] 2012/01/28

Yeah, it's THAT Lemur - the control interface that ran on JazzMutant's 2,000 euro touchscreen hardware, used by artists such as Björk, Daft Punk, Justice, Orbital and Richie Hawtin. It's been brought to iOS by Liine, a company already visible on the iOS music scene with apps including Kapture Pad, Remiix, and the Griid clip launcher/mixer for Ableton Live.

Lemur uses a collection of objects, including faders, buttons, balls, knobs, breakpoints and menus. These are assembled into custom templates, using the Lemur Editor application, and configured to send MIDI or OSC commands to software on your computer - Ableton Live, Reaktor, Traktor, Modul8, whatever. As if that isn't enough, custom scripting and integration with Max/MSP or Max For Live creates a more complex layer of near unlimited options.

Uniquely, Lemur has a physics engine that simulates 'gravity' or 'friction' type behaviours, including the notorious (and sometimes derided) bouncing balls you've probably seen in Lemur demos. All very well but, history lesson aside, how does it translate to the iPad, iPhone, and iPod Touch?

And here's another question - what makes the app worth a penny short of £35, when other perfectly functional control apps are a lot less? Some scepticism might be forgiven at this point!

Stretch to fit

Getting started with Lemur isn't actually too difficult - Liine's website features a user library of free templates, initially based on 'legacy' Lemur hardware examples, so you don't have to dive straight into building your own.

Existing Lemur owners will be happy to reuse their old templates, and there's a handy Lemur Stretcher application that resizes those older templates to fit the iPad. Completed templates are loaded into the app via iTunes, or updated through the Editor over WiFi.

Lemur typically connects to your computer through an ad hoc WiFi network (routers introduce too much latency). As mentioned above, it can send MIDI or OSC - for wireless MIDI communication you need to run the Lemur Daemon receiver app, but you can use a hardware MIDI interface, which is said by Liine to be the lowest-latency solution.

It was spooky to load Mu, a Live-dedicated setup that ran on the Lemur hardware, released back in early 2010 - this is like the daddy of Griid, displaying clip names and colours, and with scene launching, a mixer, device controls and sends. Mu is still totally usable, though you also need Max For Live.

What is 'ultimate'?

The biggest challenge with Lemur is figuring out an 'ultimate' control layout, if there is such a thing - most of the user library examples are somewhat brainiac looking, but don't be embarrassed to make big dumb setups with big fat buttons. Pick a template that most resembles how you want to work, then edit that, and save the scripting for later.

We missed the KBMouse object, which enabled Lemur to send keyboard commands; hopefully this powerful feature will return in the future, otherwise you can use Max/MSP or Max For Live to compensate.

Once the science project of setting up is complete, it's time to play. Liine is talking up Lemur as a stable, professional product, and the app indeed proved stable during the review period, with the controls being very responsive.

MIDI latency over WiFi was usable, but for instrument input, as with the keyboard template, latency was negligible with wired MIDI, going through IK's iRig MIDI. This would also be a safer option for live use, because iRig can provide mains power to iOS devices, unlike some other interfaces.

Better support

Tech support is greatly improved over the JazzMutant days - it's much easier to get the info you need, which was a major complaint previously. We'd like some Logic templates, and I'd suggest a free feature-limited version might help the undecided commit. In-app template editing is missing.

Lemur comes alive on the iPad - this is how it should always have been: portable, battery powered, cable-free, ready to take anywhere. It's even valid on the iPhone and iPod Touch for those odd little remote control functions, or as a sidekick to the iPad version.

Lemur will suck up all of your spare time, and your other gear might get dusty. The price? Totally worth it. This Lemur comes in at roughly £1,600 cheaper than the hardware version, and you can run it on multiple devices.

iPad's progressas a destroyer of hardware is awesome to behold, and it's found the perfect partner with Lemur. This is the most exciting development in iOS music's (short) history.

Read more about Liine Lemur iOS at MusicRadar.com


Korg Monotron Duo

[ 0 ] 2012/01/28

The music world was taken by surprise in 2010 when Korg announced the release of a new pocket-sized synth. Could this really be Korg - committed digital hardware manufacturer - releasing its first new analogue synth for nearly 30 years?

Even more surprisingly, was such a forward-thinking company really basing parts of the circuitry on designs found in its MS-10 and MS-20 synths of the 1970s? The hype turned out to be true and - despite its quirks - we loved the original Monotron, fiddly ribbon controller, noisy output and all.

"As a pure synthesis tool, the Duo is significantly more versatile than the original Monotron."

The Monotron synth engine was included in this year's Monotribe groovebox, suggesting that Korg was gradually working towards something bigger and even more impressive, so it came as another surprise when it was announced that two new models were being added to the Monotron range, the Duo and Delay. Korg obviously isn't quite finished with its analogue heritage just yet.

What's new?

Eagerly pulling the Duo from its packet, we find a unit based on the same form factor as the original, right down to the position of the five knobs and three-way slider switch on the front panel. Both Duo and Delay feature the same basic setup - ribbon controller, integrated speaker, headphone output, auxiliary input and compartment on the back for the supplied pair of AAA batteries.

The differences start to become apparent when you check out the controls. The Duo (blue case, regular keys) adds another oscillator and a cross-modulation control to the original Monotron design. Meanwhile, the Delay (black case, reverse keys, funky Sci-Fi paint job) adds an analogue-style delay circuit.

1+1 = Duo?

The Duo concept revolves around a relatively simple twist on the Monotron: inspired by the X-mod feature on Korg's Mono/Poly synth of the early '80s, Korg have added a second oscillator. The Duo's twin VCOs nominally produce square waves, but a quick check with an oscilloscope reveals that the shape is quite a bit more harmonically rich than a pure square, like a square with a bit of sawtooth blended in to add some bite.

The real magic comes from the fact that VCO1's frequency can be modulated by the output of VCO2, with the level of modulation determined by the X-MOD INT knob. It's vaguely similar to the effect created by modulating pitch with the LFO on the original Monotron, but the Duo's two VCOs both respond to the keyboard input, rather than the modulation frequency being fixed.

It takes a few minutes to get the hang of the Duo's options. With the slider switch on the VCO1 setting, only VCO1 is sent to the output but VCO2 can still be used to modulate its frequency. The VCO1+2 setting sends both to the output.

VCO1's pitch adjustment has a range of around four octaves, while the range of VCO2 is also dependent on the setting of VCO1 - not in the sense that the audio output of VCO1 modulates VCO2, but that higher settings for VCO1 will also increase the pitch range of VCO2.

If all this sounds a little confusing, fear not. The bottom line is that, just like the original, you don't really need to know how the Duo works in order to coax some great sounds out of it. With VCO2 pitch at lower settings, cross-modulation makes the sound get edgy and slightly atonal. Crank VCO2 up and it gets brighter and more cutting.

To add to the sonic range, the classic MS filter section from the original Monotron is still present, sculpting the tone from mellow subby basslines to ear-splitting leads. As a pure synthesis tool, the Duo is significantly more versatile than the original Monotron.

Of course, all this comes at a price. The Duo loses the original Monotron's LFO and with it the ability to modulate oscillator pitch or filter cutoff. VCO2 can be tuned down below the audio frequency range for LFO-style pitch modulation, but the wave shape and the fact that it tracks the keyboard make it sound quite different to the original.

Likewise, the auxiliary input is still present in order to process any signal through the filter, but given that the Duo has no LFO you might be better off with the original Monotron if this is a priority.

Duo tuning

When we reviewed Korg's Monotribe we loved the introduction of the new ribbon modes - narrow, wide and chromatic - which affected the response of the Monotron-derived synth engine's tiny keyboard. In chromatic mode, the Monotribe quantises your finger's position on the ribbon to the nearest note, making it much easier to play in tune with other instruments.

The Monotron Duo expands on the idea with Major and Minor modes, each of which limits the keyboard to a basic scale. A small red button on the back panel toggles between four modes: continuous, Minor, Major and Chromatic. Hooking the Duo up to a tuner with Chromatic mode activated, its oscillators track accurately across the full keyboard range with only a couple of cents deviation from perfect tuning.

Korg tells us that an auto-tuning circuit is used to keep keyboard tracking stable at any temperature. Even taking into account the fact that the full keyboard range is only just over an octave, it means the device can be used to play melodies and riffs much more easily than the fiddly original Monotron.

You'll still have to tune the Duo to your other gear by holding down a note and adjusting VCO1 until you hit the right pitch, but it's a small price to pay for near-perfect intonation. Of course, continuous ribbon mode is still available for FX sweeps and legato styles.

Tron legacy

I'm absolutely certain that Monotron owners will decide to add one or even both of the new models to their collection. The Duo's adoption of the Monotribe's chromatic ribbon modes make it a much more appropriate option for pitch-perfect melodies.

At a bargain RRP of £42 for either of the new Monotrons, or last year's original unit, these are great value.

Our only real complaint is with the way Korg are drip-feeding us new features with successive Monotron and Monotribe releases. The company now has four different analogue devices on the market, each with slightly different feature sets.

We know Korg can make stable analogue oscillators, awesome MS-style filters, step sequencers and analogue drum circuits, so doesn't it make sense to bring all those ideas together in the same unit? Modders will relish the idea of hacking Monotrons and Monotribes together to create insane custom synths, but the rest of us are desperate for Korg to cram all that technology into one box and release the brand new analogue synth we suspect the company's hinting at.

So, Korg, what's it going to be next? Polytron? Drumatron? Or Monotron Pro? We can't wait.

Read more about Korg Monotron Duo at MusicRadar.com


Powered by FeedBurner

eXTReMe Tracker